The newest graphics playing cards from AMD are very poor worth in accordance with AMD. in blog post (Opens in a brand new tab) Claiming to elucidate why there’s a greater time to purchase an AMD GPU, the corporate has proven precisely how poor the worth proposition is from the newest RDNA 3-era graphics.
In a chart titled “Common 1080p Efficiency and $/FPS Throughout 6 Video games,” the brand new AMD Radeon RX 7900 XTX (Opens in a brand new tab) And RX 7900 XTX (Opens in a brand new tab) Proven to ship a lot worse returns by way of fps per greenback.
The RX 7900 XT and XTX each ship lower than half the frames per greenback of AMD’s finest GPU. In fact, these new RDNA 3 fashions are high-end boards. And the very best worth will not be often discovered within the prime of the GPU vary.
Nonetheless, what makes a really uncomfortable learn for AMD is how a lot worse the brand new RDNA 3 boards carry out in comparison with the earlier technology RDNA 2 GPUs. The RX 7900 XTX delivers 0.373 frames per greenback and the RX 7900 XT 0.395 in accordance with AMD’s personal numbers.
However the earlier technology Radeon RX 6800 (Opens in a brand new tab) Nails 0.655 frames per greenback and up 6950XT (Opens in a brand new tab) Returns 0.484 frames per greenback. Although AMD took the RX 6950 XT’s unique MSRP at its $1,099 launch worth, that may be a lot worse than any of the RDNA 3 playing cards.
Whereas it is changing into considerably inevitable that the brand new technology of graphics {hardware} will likely be dearer, in our e book it’s best to by no means get much less efficiency to your cash with new {hardware}. That is precisely the other of how technological progress is meant to work.
Look elsewhere on the chart and it is not shocking to search out that it is Radeon RX6700XT (Opens in a brand new tab) which presents by far the very best general worth proposition at 0.726 frames per greenback. The 6700 XT wasn’t essentially the most highly effective performer at launch, however at its present worth of $369 and precise road costs in an analogous space, it actually stood out by itself and stood out fully in a market full of costly GPUs.
For the file, AMD’s nice print signifies that the efficiency per greenback numbers within the printed graph had been primarily based on a variety of video games together with Apex Legends, Valorant, Name of Responsibility: Trendy Warfare 2, The Callisto Protocol, GTA V, and Overwatch 2 all examined. GPUs at 1080p max settings apart from the RX 6400 the place the ‘medium’ preset was generously allowed and will subsequently be successfully ignored. The 0.849 frames per greenback fee it achieves in accordance with AMD is extremely deceptive.
On an analogous be aware, our benchmarks line up completely with AMD’s numbers. The RX 6700 XT is certainly AMD’s finest worth providing but. But when AMD’s rigorously curated numbers make the brand new RDNA 3 boards appear to be poor worth, unbiased third-party testing is unlikely to yield a greater narrative.
It is also value noting that Nvidia’s new line of graphics playing cards, Nvidia’s Ada would not look any higher. In truth, the RTX 4090 and RTX 4080 each ship worse framerates per greenback figures than AMD’s newest GPUs when evaluating our personal inside numbers. Though the RTX 4070 Ti is certainly by far the higher card out of the 5 new playing cards launched. If you happen to can add the theoretical thought of ”worth” to a $799 GPU.
All of that is repeating a depressingly acquainted narrative about pc graphics pricing. The state of affairs stinks and we very a lot hope it will get higher quickly.
#AMDs #GPUs #fairly #poor #to.. #AMD
